rhetoric and reasons for raisins
Monday, April 13, 2015
A change of heart...
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
English Symposium
The presentation that I attended was
entitled ““A Revolutionary Act”: Investigating the Draw of Dystopia in Young
Adult Literature”, and was given by Rachel Pullan. In this presentation, she centered her main points
on “Catching Fire”, written by Suzanne Collins. Pullan talked about how the Hunger Games
series is based in a dystopian society; one in which none of the adults seem willing
to do anything to overcome the problems which plague them. In the end, it is a young woman who sparks
rebellion to change the path of this society.
This topic of literature can be found interesting to younger people
because it is a relatable younger individual in the novel who is having a
magnificent sociopolitical effect upon her entire country. Also, the main character is not complacent,
but is willing to go against common beliefs to help build a new world. Suzanne Collins
Monday, March 16, 2015
Saturday, March 14, 2015
Connecting in the wrong places
In
our current times, a major shift has taken place; indeed, a cultural shift
which affects you, me, and everyone in our country. At a distressingly increasing rate, young
people are setting their hearts on the secular things of the world, and abandoning
their churches in numbers that have never before been seen. As this trend continues to grow, it has been
statistically seen that three in every four churchgoing youth are likely to
leave their congregation and choose a life where they are no longer religiously
obligated. Young people receive the majority
of their religious beliefs, as well as their religious motivation for church
attendance, from their parents. So, as
one can accurately assume, these changes in attendance and devotion to their
denominations most commonly occur in the late years of high school and the
early years of college when the young people leave home for the first time. Parents grow increasingly alarmed as the children
who they have raised to hold benign values and continue to be gospel-loving
individuals turn to new ways which embody unrighteousness (Nielson). This growing issue which encompasses the
hearts of many church goers with fear is being caused by a number of modern
external and internal influences; namely influences from peers, a growing world
of media, and a natural desire for rebellion.
Friday, March 6, 2015
Issues paper topic
For my issues paper I selected topic #1. My current intention is to make the claim that youth are leaving the church in such great numbers because of negative social influences in their lives. These influences come mainly from media, but also through their friends around them (who are also greatly affected by the media). Ultimately, I will argue that it was after these new "controversial" themes in movies became introduced that young people began to become less inclined to attend church services.
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
First two pages of rhetorical analysis
The gut-wrenching internal struggle which individuals
face when engaging a moral question can often be undeniably intense. This conflict only becomes significantly
magnified when that individual is of a firm religious background. I know that this is a true incidence through
my personal experiences. When I was
younger, I often felt that it was an undeniable necessity to bring forth punishments
according to the Law of Moses (“An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth”). However, throughout the years, I have been
influenced by church teachings which deliver statements along the lines of “Ye
have heard it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil:
but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also”
(Matthew 5: 38-39). Through such
teachings, my moral understanding has been altered and heightened, for I feel
that this religious study has shaped my being in such a way that I now have the
ability to grasp higher concepts. Of
course, religion is based around the field of Pathos, which the author uses in
his article to almost force the reader to listen to his argument. Along with this, he applies facts to his article
which serve to strengthen his viewpoint and hit a more personal tone in his
primary audience. The author also preys
upon a sense of guilt that might arise when considering the occurrence of Osama
Bin Laden’s death.
Despite creating intense and difficult statements
for many Americans to agree with, Patrick Clark creates a general argument
which many would find difficult to disagree with. The author first includes information that
appeals to his primary audience. He says
“should we consider it anything more than a blind coincidence that this
momentous attack was carried out on Divine Mercy Sunday?” This may seem obscure to some readers, but
for the intended audience of Catholics a point becomes struck home. Divine Mercy Sunday was created by Pope John
Paul II on the second Sunday of Easter in the year 2000. Its purpose is to recognize and celebrate the
divine mercy of the Lord Jesus Christ. The
author makes this connection in order to draw out the thoughts and emotions associated
with their memories of this holiday. In
doing this, he applies his argument to something that they are used to and
generally have respect for. This will
help the thought of mercy to in the conscience of his audience. This moral foundation is a way for Patrick
Clark to effectively establish his position in such a way that it will be
difficult for an argument to arise later in the paper.
Friday, February 13, 2015
The conflict of justice and mercy
The article that I found the most persuasive and the
most thought provoking was the Osama Bin Laden piece. For this reason, I will be writing my
rhetorical analysis paper on it. While
reading it, I found myself to be deeply conflicted, for while I am a member of
the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (so I have mercy-oriented
morals), I am also a Patriot, and so I found that justice had been done in
Osama’s death.
Overall, I still believe that the
death of Osama Bin Laden was a completely necessary occurrence, but I do agree
with the writer in the sense that we shouldn't celebrate death. Part of me does desire to rejoice in his destruction,
but I also know that I need to remember that he is still a child of God
(despite making horrible choices and being a terrible person…). These are the feelings which will make this
piece enjoyable to analyze, for it will be forcing two of my passions to combat
each other: my deep love for the justice
of America, and my desires to continually be like Christ.
I feel like as I work on this paper
that I will be able to find a good amount of weak points in his argument, as
well as find areas where his own words can be used against him. It seems like I will have an enjoyable time
with this assignment, and I look forward to trying out different methods for
analyzing this piece.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)